Why I Don’t Support the Teachings and Practices of "The Way of the Superior Man"
- Callie
- Jan 5
- 2 min read

As a facilitator of shamanic healing and bodywork in Austin, I believe that the tools we use to grow should expand our souls, not shrink them into boxes.
I have run into many people who study and use the material from The Way of the Superior Man. Through my professional lens and personal experience, I have found these teachings to be deeply problematic. I do not endorse or support this framework. To me, it feels outdated, chauvinistic, and out of alignment with the Transformation Path I offer.
The Trap of Simplistic Gender Roles
Deida’s work relies on a laughably reductive binary of "masculine" and "feminine" essences. This isn't just simplistic; it’s chauvinistic. By insisting that men must lead with "direction" and women must follow with "flow" or "surrender," he boxes individuals into rigid roles that feel like they belong in a different century.
In my tantra and healing sessions, I see the harm this causes. It ignores the beautiful spectrum of gender identity and expression. True somatic healing comes from integration—allowing the full complexity of your soul to breathe—not forcing yourself to play a part because of an outdated social script.
The Guru Complex: Cult Leader Vibes
One of the most unsettling aspects of Deida’s work is the air of absolute certainty he maintains. He positions himself as the ultimate authority on how men and women "should" behave, leaving zero room for independent exploration.
Frankly, this reeks of cult leader vibes.
Instead of empowering you to find your own truth, he offers a "one-size-fits-all" solution that demands total adherence to his personal ideology. This guru-like approach mirrors a narcissistic tendency to believe one's own perspective is the only valid reality. In my practice, a true guide is someone who helps you find your inner compass—not someone who replaces it with their own.
A Throne Built on Ego
The very concept of a "Superior Man" is a blaring red flag of entitlement. While the book attempts to frame this as "responsibility," it often cultivates a sense of unwarranted dominance. In a healthy, egalitarian partnership, there is no "superior."
My approach to Austin bodywork and spiritual connection is built on a foundation of mutual respect and shared power. We are looking for harmony and healthy interdependence, not a power imbalance where one person yielded power based on a chauvinistic archetype.
Emotional Stifling vs. Vulnerable Presence
The book frequently champions an emotionally unavailable version of masculinity. I’ve seen many seekers shut down their hearts to appear "unwavering," only to create deep distance in their relationships.
In the Sacred Journey, we learn that vulnerability is the ultimate strength. Expecting emotional labor from a partner while remaining stoic and "untouchable" is not a spiritual achievement—it's a recipe for loneliness.
Choosing a Path of Genuine Connection
The modern world—especially our vibrant community in Austin—deserves guidance that fosters emotional intelligence, inclusivity, and respect for the individuality of all people. My work is dedicated to those who want to step out of the "literary trash heap" of outdated stereotypes and into a space of authentic, conscious evolution.


